Given the ubiquity of double clicking, I imagine it has many origins.

If you can, then they can, because they don’t have to pay for the bureaucracy, no need for testing and accurate labeling, etc.

I’m in Canada where it is legal everywhere.
Since weed is so crazy inexpensive to grow, drug dealers have just dropped the price to where legal growers can’t compete due to the price of bureaucracy and process and things like having to actually test for potency and label appropriately.

People can get addicted to anything.
If the addiction isn’t a chemical dependence, and isn’t inherently extremely harmful, then I think it should be accessible and addiction support should be available.

Cannabis is legal here, and the level of addiction you’re describing is both very uncommon, and typically just exacerbating issues caused by other drugs or mental illness.

Pro: way more variety of edibles I can’t make myself (like fruit gummies), and I know the strength before I consume.

Not really a con, but a letdown: legal retailers can’t really compete with drug dealers prices, so it didn’t hurt the illegal drug industry or generate as much taxes as hoped.

Agree with the pros, not really with the cons to the extreme that you describe.

It just sounds forced to me.

It’s never said by people who created this slang as kids growing up with computers, it’s like managers who just invented it in their 40somethings.

Like they’re trying to be cool, but it’s just not cool

“double click” to mean “focus on” or “explore in more depth”