As simple as possible to summarize the best way you can, first, please. Feel free to expand after, or just say whatever you want lol. Honest question.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If so, your definition of ‘God’ is so far removed from what most people take God to mean as to just invite linguistic debates over debates over the thing itself.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Did you edit your comment to say you were a Christian or did I just miss that? If so, I apologise, your conception of God is quite likely similar to most Christians! I do fail to see how the argument for a transcendent being predicates the Christian God specifically, though, no offense intended.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I did edit to say I was a Christian because I realized that would probably make things clearer.

          The argumentation for the Christian god goes beyond what I posted here but builds on the concept. No offense taken.